Showing posts with label Landscape Maintenance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Landscape Maintenance. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 21, 2022

Weeds Gone Wild / A Town Divided (Letter to City Council)

By Clayton Watch

Dear Clayton City Council:

There seems to be some confusion about the reception the grassroots (parcel tax and landscaping) flyer has received throughout the community, including our efforts to organize and inform the Clayton residents of your mismanagement.

First, let me explain; Bill Walcutt and I paid for the flyers. We had multiple people contribute to the flyer content, and many (23 individuals) helped distribute all 4500 of them to the Clayton community, with a few distributed by local Clayton business owners to their customers.

The main reason for the flyer is that you are not doing your job, and some of you are trying to mislead the public. There is no leadership, and the lack of experience is evident to everyone watching.

With C.W. Wolfe at the helm last year, he accomplished nothing but proclamation after proclamation. At the mayor's conference, his comment about "sitting at the big boy's table" was chauvinistic and insulting to the women in attendance and was an embarrassment to the City of Clayton. His skill and knowledge of running a council meeting were a total disgrace. What happened to the promise of healing the divide and bringing the town back together? We're still waiting! Your first major "mistake" was passing up Jeff Wan as our mayor.

Next up, Peter Cloven, wasted $30,000 of taxpayer money to get the result we already knew. Peter got it wrong. And continues to get it wrong with his thought process. The $30,000 is taxpayer money. It doesn't matter if the money comes from the federal, state, or local government; it's still taxpayer money. Your second major "mistake" was passing up Jeff Wan again as our mayor.

Who in their right mind would think the citizens of Clayton would approve a new parcel tax measure with inflation at an all-time high? Any reasonable person would've explored Plan B first. Many of the Clayton residents we've talked with have expressed dissatisfaction that cuts to our budget were not looked at first. How about a 5% pay cut across the board, including the City Council and Planning Commission, until we identify other areas we can cut and/or create additional revenue? What about renting out the space downstairs at city hall, and how about charging a rental fee to nonprofit groups when they use our downtown for special events?

But what did you do? You went directly to the residents for a $400.00 per year parcel tax with a bogus and skewed telephone survey. Your approach was appalling, misleading, and unacceptable, especially when you lied about our budget deficit (your wish list) and got caught.

If you want to learn what real outreach is, maybe you should follow our lead and try to involve all the citizens of Clayton rather than just a few. The poor example of your outreach was the 44 people you got to respond to the door hanger "Build a City Game" flyer as it related to our housing element. In reality, the solution is simple, stop pitting neighborhoods against neighborhoods and put the housing element down by Clayton Station, where the transportation hub and jobs are located.

You have kicked the can down the road for way too long with total disregard for essential matters that our city should be dealing with, i.e., housing, landscaping, and getting City Hall in order.

It's hard to navigate these challenging issues when our City Manager is never in the office. Someone needs to be at City Hall and provide leadership. And that leadership needs to start with the City Council by giving the City Manager direction. Once again, what happened to the promise of healing the divide and bringing the city back together? C.W. Wolfe and Peter Cloven, we're still waiting!

Here is an update on the (parcel tax and landscaping) flyer response. So far, we have received 117 email responses. All have been very supportive and positive, except for one that stated they did not agree with all comments in the flyer. Reports from the volunteers passing out the flyers have been very positive. They have reported the citizens they met thanked them for their efforts and the information.

As you may know, Bill Walcutt and I have lived here for over 37 years and have never seen it this bad. The city is in a world of hurt and needs leadership badly. In addition, the community park, the downtown park, the lack of landscape maintenance all over town, the downed street light poles and directory signs, and stop signs that you have not replaced for months/years are unacceptable and embarrassing. We need competent leadership to turn this around. And we need it now.

The new sod at the Downtown Park, which was fenced off for months, is dying or dead. The City Manager said a broken water pipe caused it, and the cost to replant the sod will be covered from the special assessment for The Grove--our tax money. So, let's just let it die and then fix the water pipe and have the taxpayers pay for new sod. Great plan. Did anyone ever think about watering the lawn by hand?

Why do we not let kids use The Grove Park's splash pond? The kids throughout the community have been locked up for over two years because of Covid-19. Isn't it time we let them enjoy their summer vacation and the park? Their mental health and well-being should be a top priority. And, when are you going to water the plants throughout the town? Maybe the $30,000 tax pay money Peter Cloven wasted could have been used to keep our youth happy and our plants alive.

The water appears to be off in many parts of the town. Why? The water district only requires a 15% reduction in our water usage. To my knowledge, no regulations restrict us from turning on the water at the splash pond, let alone the drinking fountains in the Grove Park, along with watering a few plants. According to Peter Cloven, some of that ARP money ($1,600,000) we got for "free" could be used to do the right thing until we solve many of our problems. Once again, leadership is needed.

It doesn't have to be this way. Please remember it's not us against you or you against us. But if you continue going down the same road, we will have no other choice but to continue with our agenda engage the community, and make them aware of your mismanagement and lack of leadership.

Please feel free to contact us at your convenience, as we would be more than willing to sit down with any of you and explore how we can get on the same page and move the town we all love forward.

Sincerely,

Gary Hood
Clayton Watch

Bill Walcutt
Clayton Watch

P.S. To get the pulse of your constituents, I have enclosed 12 emails from the 117 emails we received at claytonwatch94517@gmail.com from handing out the flyers. We have redacted their names for privacy. If you want to see more, I would be happy to share them with you.
----------------------------------------

Emails from the Clayton Community

Fri, May 20, 11:18 AM
to ClaytonWatch94517

To Whom It May Concern,

I am a long-time resident of Clayton since July 1996 and live in the Regency Meadows neighborhood.

I read the 2-page flyer that was left on my doorstep on 5/23/2022; one side titled, “A Town Divided” and the other side titled, “Weeds Gone Wild!” Several cited claims were made in both articles, but there were no actionable items to the many claims cited. What is your ask of Clayton residents?

I have known Peter Cloven since 2018. Peter is about Peter and was an ass-wipe when I met him and remains an ass-wipe today in his role as Mayor of the City of Clayton. I have no insight nor have I interacted in any way directly with Ms. Schwartz, Ms. Tillman, or Mr. Wolfe. If there is interest to establish a united front in the Clayton community seeking Peter Cloven’s resignation as Mayor of Clayton, I would support and volunteer my time with this effort since Peter’s term in office doesn’t expire until 11/2024. It is my position that Peter’s views on what is best for the City of Clayton aren’t aligned with this Community’s views. With that said, I don’t know if Ms. Tillman, today’s Vice Mayor, would be the worse of two evils as Mayor in the event Peter resigned as Mayor of Clayton.

I agree with the claim that the City’s landscaping needs immediate attention. Parties that drive into the City’s limits accessing from Clayton Road and Oakhurst Drive are under impressed and I find it personally embarrassing as a long-time resident of Clayton. The matter of the Landscape Maintenance District fund being potentially co-mingled with the General Fund is distressing and should be addressed ASAP. How can I help?

I believe the claim of “…44% of Clayton residents do not trust our elected officials” is understated since I did not participate in any survey related to City of Clayton elected officials and I have firsthand knowledge that many of my personal friends who are Clayton residents also did not participate in any recent survey in connection with questions related to trust of the City’s elected officials.

Sincerely,

Concerned Citizen
-------------------------

Fri, May 20, 1:18 PM
To ClaytonWatch94517

Bill and Gary,

I agree with your assessment of the city. The landscaping and overall condition of Clayton is a disgrace. Both the city manager and assistant city manager should resign, and new council members should run for election. It is time for a change.

Concerned Resident
----------------------------

Fri, May 20, 9:18 PM
To ClaytonWatch94517

Bill and Gary

As a triathlete, I spend a lot of time training—which includes over a dozen hours running and biking each month—and what I see while I am out has truly reached the level of being disgusting.

In addition to chest-high weeds on the medians, trails and next to sidewalks, there is also trash and graffiti popping up on a regular basis and the roads are in terrible condition.

In that regard, the bike lanes are in such bad shape (due to a combination of poor road surface and debris) that there are parts that are unsafe to ride—which has forced me (and presumably others) out into traffic. The city will really learn its lesson when a cyclist gets hurt or injured due to those conditions (and, as a defense attorney, I know a thing or two about the subject).

For what it’s worth, I did some math and, putting aside what they already have in the landscaping budget, for the $30K spent on that ridiculous survey, they could pay someone $15/hr on a full time basis for nearly a year just to pull weeds.

Their inefficiency and incompetence really is remarkable.

Anyway, as someone who has not been shy about voicing my displeasure in the past, I mainly just wanted to say that appreciate your guys’ efforts.

Concerned Citizen
-------------------------

Sat, May 21, 9:50 PM

Gary and Bill,

I just received the door flyer and agree with the points mentioned. I currently live in the Peacock Creek neighborhood of Clayton and have lived in Clayton for 25 years. I have noticed an abundance of weeds growing in all of the sidewalk areas and curb seams throughout Clayton. Our Peacock Creek entrance sign was so overgrown with weeds that I went and pulled out all of the weeds myself last week.

As stated in the flyer, our city council seems to be eager to throw our tax dollars at costly and wasteful surveys, consultants and studies. I am totally against these expenditures. Furthermore, I have never been asked to provide my vote on any of these surveys, making me wonder how legitimate they are.

Another issue I am also strongly against is the proposed renaming of Kirker Pass because the name Kirker was supposedly a bad individual (not proven). I realize that this is more of a county issue than a Clayton issue, but I have expressed my opinion in an email to county supervisor, Karen Mitchoff. She stated that county Measure X ($200 million) will cover the renaming expenses. When we voted on Measure X, it was stated to be a health/safety-related measure and makes no mention of street renaming. Just another example of diverted/wasteful spending by our local politicians.

Getting back to Clayton-specific issues, I strongly agree that Clayton is not being managed correctly and would like to help in any way.

Thanks,
Concerned Citizen
-------------------------

Sun, May 22, 7:56 PM

Bill and Gary,

I just received the door flyer and agree with the points mentioned. I currently live in the Peacock Creek neighborhood of Clayton and have lived in Clayton for 25 years. I have noticed an abundance of weeds growing in all of the sidewalk areas and curb seams throughout Clayton. Our Peacock Creek entrance sign was so overgrown with weeds that I went and pulled out all of the weeds myself last week.

Concerned Risident
---------------------------

Sun, May 22, 9:18 PM
To ClaytonWatch94517

As stated in the flyer, our city council seems to be eager to throw our tax dollars at costly and wasteful surveys, consultants and studies. I am totally against these expenditures. Furthermore, I have never been asked to provide my vote on any of these surveys, making me wonder how legitimate they are.

Another issue I am also strongly against is the proposed renaming of Kirker Pass because the name Kirker was supposedly a bad individual (not proven). I realize that this is more of a county issue than a Clayton issue, but I have expressed my opinion in an email to county supervisor, Karen Mitchoff. She stated that county Measure X ($200 million) will cover the renaming expenses. When we voted on Measure X, it was stated to be a health/safety-related measure and makes no mention of street renaming. Just another example of diverted/wasteful spending by our local politicians.

Getting back to Clayton-specific issues, I strongly agree that Clayton is not being managed correctly and would like to help in any way.

Best regards,

Concerned Resident
----------------------------

Tue, May 24, 8:55 AM

Bill and Gary,

Hello,

Thank your support and interest in our community. As a long-term Clayton Resident and Business owner, I have noticed many changes in our community. I would argue that we should add to the list: litter, noise, speeding as “Quality of Life” issues that that should be given the highest priority by our government, including the Clayton Police Department. Our small town may be “growing up,” but these are basic quality of life issues that require our immediate attention. As Wilson and Kelly demonstrated in their 1982 paper, Broken Windows Theory, there is a tangible link between disorder in the neighborhood and incivility and crime. We should avoid mistakes of the “big cities” and address our quality of life crimes now.

Thank you,

Resident
------------

Tue, May 24, 11:55 AM

to Claytonwatch94517@gmail.com

I was so happy to receive your green letter on my doorstep. I could not agree more with how rundown with weeds our city has become!!! I called the landscaping dept one week before Easter complaining how over run with weeds our center median is at the corner of Regency and Marsh Creek! I left a msg and it took a week for someone to reply. When they did they promised me they would take care of the weeds the following week. STILL WAITING!!! I’m going to have to call again. Soooo disappointing!!!

Thanks,

Concerned Citizen
-------------------------

Wed, May 25, 9:01 PM
To Claytonwatch94517@gmail.com

Thank you so much for your recent newsletter. I have had my suspicions about this latest council for some time now. It is common knowledge that the certain council person has a major racial chip on her shoulder. I have been a Clayton resident for almost 30 years and I have always found our Police Department to be some of the most courteous, respectful and helpful Officers anyway. If this certain council person doesn't like it here, I would say to her that Concord is just down the road, Pittsburg is over the hill and Antioch can be driven to in just 30 minutes. We, the long-time Clayton residents, moved here and continue to live here because we find Clayton to be little slice of Heaven and we want to keep it that way. I, for one, don't want anything to change, including building "affordable housing" that will do nothing but bring unwanted criminal activity and clogged streets. Thank you again for your newsletter!! Keep them coming!!!!

Thank you,

Concerned Resident
----------------------------

Sun, Jun 5, 11:50 PM
To Claytonwatch94517@gmail.com

Hello,

I received your flyer that was placed on my doorstep by someone recently. After reading it I felt compelled to respond concerning a couple of things that I consider to be inaccurate about your flyer. Your flyer states that one candidate publicized that our city residents are racist. You claim that this could not be further from the truth. Only a non-minority person could possibly come to that conclusion. I have lived here for 22 plus years and as one of the few African American citizens in this city I must inform you that there is a strong smell of racism here. Why would I say this? Well, let start with last year. There were two occurrences of someone putting an effigy of a hanging Black man in one of the parks. I know this is true because I found the first one and called the police. Although they did come and cut the effigy down, there was no follow up investigation and they didn't even do a police report on it as far as I know. If they did, I was not even interviewed. In addition to this, I have been doing a 5 mile walk in clayton everyday for many years now. One day I was walking and a White guy in a van pulled up behind me and asked why I was walking in his neighborhood. When I refused to answer he threatened to call the police because I was suspicious. It wasn't until I threatened to kick his ass if he didn't leave me alone that he burned rubber while hurling "N" words out his window at me. Around about 2015 I was walking across the street on Indian way. I was in the crosswalk and the light was Green for me. There was a car stopped waiting to go. As I passed by the front of that car I heard the engine rev up and I got hit so hard that I flew over his hood and hit the ground hard. There were witnesses who worked at the golf course who saw what happened. When the police arrived they told them what they had seen as I was taken to the hospital in an ambulance. The driver of the vehicle claimed he didn't see me because I am dark. He was allowed to leave without even being ticketed for hitting me in the crosswalk. I wound up having to have brain surgery (craniotomy). I can't help but wonder what would happen to me if I ran over a White person in the crosswalk during the day and claimed I didn't see him because he was bright. There are many other instances I could site but I won't bore you with it because it is obvious by your flyer that you are biased and living in an entirely different town than the Clayton I live in. I have had bottles and trash thrown at me by vehicles passing by while they yelled the "N" word. I have encountered people who I have spoken to that ignored me and I have even known other minorities that have encountered the same things I have. So, because you have made this error about racism not being in Clayton, a town that even the newspaper reported that there were people from here that travelled to Charlotte for the tiki torch Nazi extravaganza that took place in 2018. On several occasions I have had to ask Safeway to remove racist graffiti that was painted on its fence in the back which happens to be right next to my house. On one occasion I was walking home and passed a group of teen boys. As I passed them I heard one of them ask "When did niggers move in here?" So, clearly, from a minority standpoint, there is a racist problem in Clayton. Because of this I consider the rest of your flyer to be less than reliable and have discounted it as more political lies and dribble. Any future flyers will be thrown in the trash without being read. By the way, I have never replied to a political newsletter before but this one so disturbed my peace that I had to write back.

Regards,

Concerned Citizen
-------------------------

Sun, Jun 12, 4:38 PM
To Claytonwatch94517

I appreciate the info and it disturbs me. I really don’t have an answer and I don’t know what to do. I hate that some of our government doesn’t even live in Clayton. I feel that they want to hurt Clayton cause they can’t afford to live here. It took me and my spouse a lot of hours past the 40hr to earn money to be able to get here. I want to say to them to grow up! It scares me what they are doing.

Sent from my iPhone
----------------------------

Tue, Jun 14, 4:56 PM

Hello Bill and Gary,

My husband and I are Clayton residents and have been here since 2013. Not a long time, compared to some residents, but we certainly call this our home sweet home. We have noticed a dramatic change in Clayton’s landscaping maintenance, or lack thereof, particularly around the library close to where we live. We are also alarmed by the graffiti, which these days seems to be everyone (check out the new comments using the “f” word above the creek at the corner of Clayton and Marsh Creek Road. We are also shocked by all of the garbage around town. I emailed the City back in March wondering if they were planning to host an Earth Day Clean Up Day in the City, as they had in the past and they said no and when I asked why they said “don’t know.” I almost thought about organizing an informal clean up around town, but I’m working woman who was particularly busy that month.

If you are a group of volunteers who need more voices, please let me know and would love to meet up with you if you host any get togethers. I was a big supporter of Jeff Wan (still am) and I’m still waiting for him to become Mayor one day. Hopefully that will happen soon!

Looking forwards to chatting/meeting with you in the future!

Best regards,

Concerned Resident

We appreciate you for reading this article.

--------------------------------------------------------

Please support our cause with a small donation today!

Wednesday, June 8, 2022

The Grove - More Taxpayer Funded Incompetence

Shared Correspondence from the Community: We value the diverse perspectives of our readers and aim to encourage meaningful conversations. Occasionally, we may share excerpts from correspondence received from our followers or gathered from social media to promote civil discussions. While we may not always agree with the opinions shared, we believe in facilitating a platform for respectful debates. Thank you for contributing to the ongoing conversation in the comments section. Remember to keep your comments respectful and concise.

------------------------------------------------------------

By Clayton Watch

Just as you thought it could not get any worse. After two plus years of neglect, the city manager decided to rehab the grass at Clayton's Downtown Park, The Grove. 

The area was fenced off, the shaded grass area was torn up, prepped and new sod was installed, the large grass area was prepped and re-seeded. The fence stayed up for months while the grass areas came back to life. The new sod was looking great.
 
Then, the new sod started dying and a lot of it was already dead. So, I sent an email to Peter Cloven, Clayton's self-absorbed Mayor, regarding this issue and several other issues that needed to be addressed at the park. 

After a week with no response from our mayor (Pretty common occurrence. I guess he is pretty busy making "Who I Am" videos), I sent him a trace. He then forwarded my email to the city manager for a response. 

Here is the city manager's response regarding the demise of the new sod:--taxpayer money. ("There has been a water line break under the turf area; water has been temporarily turned off to dry out the sod so the repairs can be made. As soon as it is fixed, the watering will begin again and we will re-plant/replace as needed. The cost for the repairs are covered from the special assessment for The Grove.") This " temporary" shutting off of water continued until all the new sod turned brown and died (they pretty much figured it was dried out when it was all dead) Great plan! 

In other words, let it die, and then fix the water pipe. After we fix the water pipe and all the sod is dead, then we will go ahead and charge the taxpayers (City leaders probably believe it is not real money because it is being paid for from the special parcel tax for the Grove) to replace all the sod. The lack of good judgement keeps getting worse and Clayton taxpayers are paying for it. What did Cloven do about it? You guessed it--Nothing.

It is no wonder Clayton is facing a budget shortfall.

Signed,

Concerned Resident

We appreciate you for reading this article.

--------------------------------------------------------

Please support our cause with a small donation today!

Thursday, May 12, 2022

It is Time for a Change - Weeds Gone Wild / A Town Divided! - Never Underestimate the Impact of Incompetence

By Clayton Watch (4500 flyers distributed)

Frontside of Flyer

It is Time for a Change - Weeds Gone Wild

When Clayton was incorporated in 1964, our first Mayor, Bob Hoyer, and his organizational team wanted Clayton to be different than Concord. They wanted people driving down Clayton Road to know when they reached Clayton's city limits that they are now in a different town--Clayton. There was no big monument sign identifying this new city and no natural geographic barrier to separate Clayton from Concord as you drove down Clayton Road. So Mayor Hoyer and his team decided, among other things, to make the street signs and street lights different than Concord. Thus, the brown street signs and hanging street lights. They wanted this to be a positive experience.

Well, Clayton's new leadership team, Cloven,Tillman and Wolfe, has achieved this goal in a different way. When you drive down Clayton Road and Oakhurst Drive today it is obvious you have entered a different city because the landscaping in the medians and the right-of-ways change. People are greeted with dead plants and healthy weeds and it is very obvious you have entered a different town. I don't think this is what Mayor Hoyer and his leadership team had in mind when they wanted Clayton to be different. It has only taken Cloven, Tillman and Wolfe one and a half years to turn this city into an eyesore---pathetic.

Clayton residents pay an annual parcel tax of $274.00 to maintain the city's landscaping that goes into the Landscape Maintenance District fund. With around 4,500 parcels in Clayton this generates approximately $1.2 million a year for this restricted fund. For the last couple of years there has been little to no maintenance and the city looks rundown, uncared for and sad, from the gem it used to be (Not only is this an eyesore it is creating dangerous fire conditions). Therefore, there has to be a huge surplus in this fund if the city has not been playing games with the money. First it was the drought and then Covid-19 as the reasons our landscaping lacked maintenance. I guess Concord was immune from these conditions or maybe they have real city leaders. Perhaps, Coven, Tillman and Wolfe could get together with Concord's leadership team for some leadership training.

This has gone on long enough and must be corrected. This city was on automatic pilot last year under Wolfe's leadership and it appears Cloven is following in his footsteps.

Cloven should step down as Mayor and let someone that knows how to lead this city take over.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Backside of Flyer

A Town Divided! - Never Underestimate the Impact of Incompetence

By Clayton Watch (4500 flyers distributed)

According to a recent $30,000 taxpayer-funded survey (pushed by City Manager, Reina Schwartz, and supported by the city council majority Peter Cloven, Holly Tillman, and C.W. Wolfe), our town is divided, and 44% of Clayton residents do not trust our elected officials. Furthermore, the people surveyed rejected the $400.00 per year parcel tax increase, including a sales and utility tax.

The dynamic four (Schwartz, Cloven, Tillman, and Wolfe) wasted $30,000 of taxpayer money to tell them what we already knew.

Here are some thoughts to help you understand why we’re so divided:

● Prior to the last election for two vacant seats on the Clayton City Council, two candidates, one, in particular, touted our City was racist and our police profile. This could not be further from the truth.

● The City Council majority voted to disregard the historical council rotation policy (as outlined in the City Council Guidelines) and denied Vice Mayor Jeff Wan the Mayor position he deserved and has earned. The same majority, Peter Cloven, Holly Tillman, and C.W. Wolfe passed up Jeff Wan once again in the 2021 rotation for mayor. He could have been our first Asian American Mayor and provided us with the leadership we desperately need.

● At a February 2022 council meeting, the City Manager, Reina Schwartz put out false and misleading information on the city's budget deficit, as reported in the Clayton Pioneer, claiming it would be $629,000 next fiscal year, instead of the $109,000 as indicated in the Staff Report. It was Reina's pathetic attempt, along with backing from Councilmembers Peter Cloven, Holly Tillman, and C.W. Wolfe, to generate support for a new $400 parcel tax.

- Clayton's $629,000 budget deficit is not real. The $629,000 budget deficit, as being pushed, is actually what the City Manager, Reina Schwartz along with three council members, Cloven, Tillman, and Wolfe are calling unmet needs (a.k.a. WISH LIST) that included hiring more staff and providing raises.

- It was their sad attempt to fool the public into thinking a $400.00 per year parcel tax increase, along with increasing the sales and utility taxes, we all pay, were desperately needed before the city went dark.

- We do not need additional staff or higher salaries – what we need is real leadership, not salespeople or spin-doctors.

- For the record, according to a national survey, the #1 Reason people leave their employment is - a “Toxic Work Culture”, followed by a lack of leadership. It’s not always about money!

● Over the past year and a half, our City Manager, Reina Schwartz, along with the support of council members Peter Cloven, Holly Tillman, and C.W. Wolfe have wasted over $15,000 on several consultants for their goal-setting sessions. This is a waste of taxpayer money, especially when there is a projected budget deficit. The city has not even addressed or accomplished the goals that were set in the prior two years.

● The City of Clayton has not balanced its books in over 18 months, so they really do not know what the budget deficit will be for the next fiscal year if any. Additionally, the city’s bank account was hacked to the tune of $50,000 last year, and it was not discovered or brought to the council’s attention for several months. What a way to run a city.

● Our City Manager, Reina Schwartz, provided inaccurate information to the City Council on a damage claim a citizen filed. A large city tree fell on their property causing $30,000 in damage to the fence and home. Reina failed to correct the inaccurate information that was submitted to the city’s insurance advisor, even after she was directed to do so by the City Council. To date, the corrected information has not been submitted to the city’s insurance advisor and the claim is still unpaid.

● The City Council majority voted to approve a three-story, 81-unit apartment building in Historic Downtown with inadequate parking over the objection of residents, not once, but twice.

In Summary – After looking at the results from the recent $30,000 taxpayer-funded survey, 94% of the residents surveyed said they are satisfied with the quality of life in Clayton, 92% said they are satisfied with our police, and 44% of Clayton residents do not trust our elected officials.

It's deplorable that Cloven, Tillman, Wolfe, and Schwartz,including the Clayton Pioneer, did not tell the truth about the budget situation in Clayton. It’s apparent we need new leadership we can trust to "Do the Right Thing."

Now, hopefully, you understand why we are so divided. If you would like to comment on this article, please email Claytonwatch94517@gmail.com.

We appreciate you for reading this article.

--------------------------------------------------------

Please support our cause with a small donation today!