Thursday, August 21, 2025

Public Comment Submitted by Resident

Shared Correspondence from the Community

The following statement originates from public comment submitted by a member of the public for the Tuesday, August 19th, City Council meeting.

Clayton Watch shares excerpts of correspondence received from community members and social platforms to encourage transparency and civic engagement. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Clayton Watch.

Readers are invited to join the discussion by contributing comments that are respectful and concise.
__________________________________________________

Public Comment Request – City Council Meeting, August 19, 2025

To: The Honorable Mayor, City Council, and City Staff

Cc: City Clerk, City of Clayton

Date: August 15, 2025

Subject: Public Comment Request – City Council Meeting, August 19, 2025
__________________________________________________________________

Dear Mayor Trupiano, Members of the City Council, and City Staff,

Please accept the following statement for inclusion in the Public Comment section of the upcoming City Council meeting on Tuesday, August 19, 2025.

Facts Matter, Holly. It’s Time to Resign

· She claims the City’s trails haven’t been maintained in years. She has been the Council representative on the Trails & Landscape Committee the entire time. What has she done? Nothing.

· She points to 4,000 hours of deferred maintenance. What solutions has she proposed or advanced? None.

· She highlights special districts running deficits for years. What action has she taken to address them? Zero.

· She pushed for “Good Governance” training at a cost of $7,000 to the City, only to later complain it didn’t address core issues. What did she do to redirect the discussion during the session? Nothing.

· She’s responsible for getting Clayton certified as a Fire Wise Community. Two years later—still nothing to show for it.

Additionally, the LMD has had a surplus of over $400,000 for two years, and ten out of eleven people on the TLC are serving on expired terms.

What “hostility” on the Council is she referring to? It’s her own hostility toward the rest of the Council.
What “dirty politics” is she talking about? There’s no corruption—only her misrepresentation.

She also leaves out key facts, such as our excellent staff, the far smaller-than-anticipated deficit, and the revenue-generating strategies currently being explored. Holly is all talk and no action. It’s easy to complain, but much harder to roll up your sleeves and do the work. She refuses to do the work.

Holly simply does not fit in with the other four Council members, who are working together to move the City forward.

Let’s not forget, she spent over $25,000 to get elected, and her #HollyOnly campaign was an embarrassment to her and to the City of Clayton. On top of that, she only managed to come in second place to the newly elected Council member who spent under $2,000.

The truth is simple: Holly does not represent the broader Clayton community. She represents a small, radical, progressive minority. Her time on Council has been marked by a lack of results, accountability, and leadership.

For the good of Clayton, Holly, please resign immediately.

Respectfully submitted,

James T. Phillips
Keller Ridge Resident

2 comments:

  1. Sounds like a typical politician. All talk, no action. The landscaping looks terrible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is this the same council member that said our police profile? I’m new to the community.

    ReplyDelete

Remember to keep your comments respectful and concise.