Clayton Watch · Candidate Record Review · No. 2
Maria Shulman for Clayton
City Council
An update on the Clayton City Council election. Seven residents have pulled papers to run. As of today, four have submitted the completed paperwork required to qualify for the November ballot.
Those who have pulled papers: Peter Cloven, Councilmember Kim Trupiano, Mayor Jeff Wan, Planning Commissioner Maria Shulman, Amy Callaghan, Jim Killoran, and Charlie Schmidt.
Over the coming months, Clayton Watch will examine the public record of each of these candidates and publish what we find, from City records, our own files, and other background material. We will do this for every name on the list.
Next up, Maria Shulman. She has not held elected office in Clayton. She currently serves on the Planning Commission. Because there is no Council voting record to review, what follows draws on her filed application to the City and on her own candidate statement.Throughout her career, Maria Shulman has dedicated herself to caring for individuals, and she has spent her years in Clayton serving this community.
Four credentials at three universities, every one of them earned while working.
She started at Temple University with a Bachelor’s in Criminal Justice and a minor in Mental Health. She trained at the Germantown Hospital and Medical Center School of Nursing for her nursing diploma, the working nurse’s route into the profession rather than the academic one. From the University of Texas at Arlington she added a Bachelor of Science in Nursing and Public Health, then a Master’s in Healthcare Administration.
Criminal justice, mental health, public health, nursing, administration. Every one of those disciplines turns up in a Clayton council packet sooner or later.
She has already put Clayton’s missing evacuation plan in writing.
In her filed application to the City, Maria Shulman noted the Commission had been made aware that Clayton has no evacuation plan. She also drew the line correctly: evacuation planning is not the Planning Commission’s job, but road width, secondary access points, and proposed density in high fire zones and at the wildland-urban interface are. Those are the conditions that bottleneck an evacuation route during a fire.
She has taken coursework from the Institute for Local Government on CEQA and its impact on wildfire risk reduction. Clayton sits against open hillside. This is the rare candidate statement that names a specific hazard and the specific lever a commission actually controls.
Chair of the Clayton Planning Commission in 2025, Vice Chair in 2024.
In these roles, she helped guide thoughtful growth that preserves Clayton’s small-town character.
Her filed statement of philosophy sets out three principles: decisions grounded in data, staff expertise, and applicable codes rather than personal preference; a transparent process where residents and applicants are both heard before a vote; and long-term thinking that weighs a project’s cumulative effect on infrastructure, housing affordability, and community identity. She calls the seat a public trust.
A nurse and healthcare leader recognized for patient advocacy.
As a nurse and healthcare leader, Maria Shulman has held management, supervisory, pediatric special-needs, and care-management positions, earning recognition from Today’s Nurse for her advocacy and leadership in patient care. That work taught her to listen attentively, ask tough questions, and make considered decisions when the stakes are high.
Experience managing budgets, ensuring compliance, and owning decisions.
She brings extensive experience in managing budgets, ensuring regulatory compliance, and being accountable for her decisions.
Those are the three things a Council member is actually asked to do, and she has done all three in a field where getting them wrong has immediate consequences.
Serving Clayton beyond City Hall, for seventeen years.
She also serves on the Clayton Community Library Foundation Board and volunteers at events such as Clayton Cleans Up, the Art & Wine Festival, the Fourth of July parade, and Oktoberfest.
Add Holidays in the Grove and decorating the Police Department 4x4. None of it carries a vote or a title.
In her own words
“I’m a wife, mother, and a nurse who reads the fine print and asks the hard questions, and I’ll do that for every Clayton resident.”
Keep Clayton moving forward.
Clayton Watch is reviewing the record of each 2026 Council candidate.
By Clayton Watch, FPPC ID #1471612. Biographical and Commission details are drawn from Ms. Shulman’s application for appointment on file with the City of Clayton; quoted passages are her own statement. Conclusions are the opinions of the committee.

This is a breath of fresh air compared to Cloven. You go girl!
ReplyDeleteagree
DeleteWe moved to Clayton just about a year ago, and Maria seems to be a breath of fresh air compared to all the drama I've heard about. She has my vote!
ReplyDeleteFinally, we have an adult in the room. Good luck, Maria
ReplyDeleteThat’s quite a résumé. My vote is for her all the way. Kathy and Rob
ReplyDeleteShe sounds solid. I’d vote for her. - Sandy
ReplyDeleteI live in Oakhurst, Isn’t she pro growth?
ReplyDeleteYes
DeleteI dont think so. She just follows the law. No games and all business.
DeleteThey all follow the law. For example, the Olivia project was viewed lawful by the court system.
DeleteNo doubt a resident of Peacock Creek upset over some town homes. But odds are also someone who voted for Holly Tilman also known as high density Holly who supported the Olivia. Back in 2020, where were all the Peacock Creek people when most were fighting the Olivia? It didn’t affect them so most didn’t care. How many voted for the two pro growth candidates Cloven and Tillman. If you watched or attended those meetings, those votes were done according to the law. Maria brought up the issue of more exits so she is looking ahead as a good planning commissioner. Meanwhile Olivia is on its way to becoming a drug rehab facility. I’ll take townhomes over that!
DeleteShe "follows the law" ? No, she supports the lawless which is why she is on record supporting the "it checks all the boxes" 30 Townhome Project being developed by the Oakhurst convicted felons. - I used to support her now NOT as she is turned to been a "sheep" as someone described for feckless get nothing done but look good discussing Wann and Trupiano - sure to listen to them some might disagree, but are your eyes lying to you look at the condition of the fountain, the landscaping the botched street paving projects, the painted sidewalks downtown in anticipation of some un-need grant project (could have asked for and received a historic district exemption) my point is present incompetence and now Schulman would just add to that mix.
DeleteOlivia had many backroom deals with local realtors and council members. Let that sit and marinate.
DeleteThis is Maria’s husband. She is a sheep? I can’t stop laughing so hard. Thanks for making my day.
DeleteHere you go husband. This should really make your day.
DeleteShe’s:
S — Steady (or Straight-talking)
H — Honest
E — Engaged (or Effective)
E — Ethical (or Experienced)
P — Principled (or Prepared)
So there you go. - Al & Becky, lower Easley
Like in Cloven:
DeleteC — Checkbook. Went unreconciled for more than 18 months.
L — Ledger. Roughly $50,000 the City Manager reported unaccounted for.
O — Olivia on Marsh Creek. 81 units, limited parking. Voted yes. Twice.
V — Voted no. On the City budget that funds police, roads, and services.
E — Explain. Asked on the record what Clayton held in accounts and investments, he couldn’t.
N — New taxes. A $30,000 survey to ask again, then a $400-a-year parcel tax.
Pretty funny.
DeleteSo one sided as opposed to the Peter Cloven review. Cloven's do es not come from his filed application to the City and on his own candidate statement as does the info for Shulman.
ReplyDeleteCloven has a four year documented history of his activities, his voting record and his lack of leadership on serious issues facing this city. His previous record of public service does not go away by re-writing history.
DeleteMaria was never on the city council, Peter was.
DeletePeter was a complete failure.
DeleteThat is the opinion of CW. You let Shulman speak for herself. Why not Cloven? Answer because you are a PAC and, by definition, a supporter of candidates of your choice.
DeleteAgree
DeleteIf she is in...who gets voted out...Wan or Trupiano
ReplyDeleteI can only vote once, and it won't be for either Wan or Trupiano. He supports his narrative, and she is a sheep.
DeleteYou decide. Please vote. All three are great people. Vote early and vote often.
DeleteWell judging
DeleteI voted for her two years ago and I am certainly going to vote for her again in November.
ReplyDeleteSame here.
DeleteShe received 3,459 votes last election, which is quite the feat for her first rodeo! You have my family's votes, Maria, and thank you for running.
DeleteAmazing, the long sought after Clayton evacuation plan.
ReplyDeleteMany thanks Maria! Thank you for running.